tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7211831559462304622.post1240512633381605368..comments2009-06-18T22:23:01.973-07:00Comments on A reason to soar..: Dont give them fishes!Nagamanikandanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09624933052382785250noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7211831559462304622.post-61635135671479934792009-06-17T05:09:00.031-07:002009-06-17T05:09:00.031-07:00well guys both of ur points were too gud and un de...well guys both of ur points were too gud and un deniable, but i felt both were not neutral too.<br /><br />tacking the positive side of philanthropy - we could conclude tat giving a helping hand would improve the social / economical standard of the country over a period of time. But Human beings are the most clever animals which will always find a loop hole in any system. Typically people will learn to utilize all the help given and try to avoid working hard if they know the help is certain till they improve.<br />ultimate result of philathropy would count the lazy fellows' number up.<br /><br />Where as GIVING NOTHING might demoralize the energetic souls (atleast to a little extent) but the most handsome outcome of it would be "people will aquaint the rule DO OR DIE soon". but aids to the right persons always have higher potential for improvement.<br /><br />Hence can we have a conclusion that a goverment should have faith in helping the right ones and turing every one in to the right ones catagory.<br /><br />My point is that help should be given to the ones who are to take the pain and over a period of time every one wil come to know NO PAIN GIVES NO GAIN..!KUMARnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7211831559462304622.post-18582924882937491292009-06-10T23:10:58.613-07:002009-06-10T23:10:58.613-07:00@Jegashree
Thanks a lot for your comment.
The fol...@Jegashree<br /><br />Thanks a lot for your comment.<br />The following may be the reasons why mendicants don't prevail in developed countries.<br /><br />1.Government has a ban on it<br />2.Philanthrophy is comparitively lesser or not practiced THIS way.<br />3.There are no groups which 'make' people 'disabled' or rent children, exploiting the aforesaid philanthropy, making begging a commercial activity.<br />4.Physically-challenged souls of those countries practice ways to be self-dependent.There are specimens of them who effectuated a lot more than normal masses could do.<br /><br />If philanthropy is practiced more in india, can we say demises due to starvations and unemployability is less here?Unfortunately it is far higher.Economic conditions cannot be blamed as it is mutually dependent with the competency levels of citizens.We need to cogitate on it.Nagamanikandanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09624933052382785250noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7211831559462304622.post-77884793208626037882009-06-09T04:40:12.852-07:002009-06-09T04:40:12.852-07:00@Jegashree
I feel that this could be a misnomer. ...@Jegashree<br /><br />I feel that this could be a misnomer. Protecting beggers definitely created more beggers. We are not talking about the physically under previleged. Even otherwise...<br /><br />I am sure you will dissent..Sivaprakasamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03367882690679953586noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7211831559462304622.post-28109225218998602822009-06-09T04:10:25.508-07:002009-06-09T04:10:25.508-07:00Nice concept n well written, but i would like to q...Nice concept n well written, but i would like to quote certain things where i felt a difference in opinion.The beggars of our country are not doing that out of choice.Some are too old to work, may be some are not physically fit to do any work n may be some dont get work,,Yes there are fit and healthy people in the group but it will be only a very few.A major chunk of them are left with no choice.Beggars' situation is not like what is shown in tamil cinemas as they have mobile phones, hefty bank balance and other stuff.I have seen some of them who tried to get a job(any small job) but didnt get either due to unemployment or unemployability.So they land up in doing the same thing which they used to do so that they get a minimum assurance of food...Also the difference between philanthrophy and CSR needs to be understood.We need to create a platform for them to comeup in life before stopping any philanthrophic activities.First we need to teach them how to fish, then provide a fishing rod to all and then only we can stop providing fish to them.Till then its the duty of the others to support the unemployable people..Jegashreehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03853606615240096915noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7211831559462304622.post-70644730168200952922009-06-09T01:31:07.236-07:002009-06-09T01:31:07.236-07:00There is a saying " If u born poor,it is not ...There is a saying " If u born poor,it is not your fault. If u die poor, then its yours". The system must enable an ambiance(what i meant as fishing rod) to get the best out of oneself.You cannot deny the fact that it is essential even for the most competent.Nagamanikandanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09624933052382785250noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7211831559462304622.post-12229871806534307912009-06-09T00:49:56.588-07:002009-06-09T00:49:56.588-07:00Very nice central theme and lucidly pointed out. B...Very nice central theme and lucidly pointed out. But time and again, you seem to be contradicting yourself. Give them rods not the fish is fine heresay. But giving a rod itself is a favour. Govt by and large seems to act as a regulator with a purpose to bring in inclusive growth. Hence the format to tax the rich n give the poor the infra to develop. But it should be understood that such equitable growth is bound to bring in more disparity, because the poor is not equipped to work without infra. Or take it this way. Govt regulates a reservation in private firms (say). This will source new opportunities. But incompetency not only spoils the firm but the person involved. One thing that must be noted is guys dont remain rich forever. Only intelligence remains forever. Intelligent people (poor be it) will offset n take on wealth. N I feel that its the right of intelligence to claim whats due.<br /><br />Don't give even the fishing rod. He will fish if he is intelligent.Sivaprakasamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03367882690679953586noreply@blogger.com